Santa Fe, NM (PRWEB) May 27, 2008 — Shane “The Peoples Chemist” Ellison is offering a “Take Action Report” entitled Great Sex Starts in the Kitchen. It offers simple tips for avoiding sweet sabotage while teaching simple and tasty recipes courtesy of Wellness Bakeries. He insists that the general public must be more aware of the risks associated with commonly used sweeteners. Here is some information from the “Take Action Report” on these common sweeteners:
Discovered to be 300 times sweeter than sugar, Saccharin (chemically known as 1,1-Dioxo-1,2-benzothiazol-3-one) was the first drug used as an artificial sweetener. As early as 1911, a board of federal scientists warned against its use in food by insisting that it was, “an adulterant.” The biggest fear was cancer. Early studies showed bladder cancer among mice. This was later proven not to translate into humans due to stark bladder differences. However, skin and lung cancer have begun to surface. Studies have not been able to confirm definitively if these threats translate into human risk. The US government’s National Toxicology Program lists saccharin as an “anticipated carcinogen.” Given its wild-card cancer status, saccharin is hardly a safe alternative to sugar. Yet, it remains a common food and supplement additive.
Discovered to be 180 times sweeter than sugar, the drug aspartame (aspartyl-phenylalanine-1-methyl ester) is found in thousands of foods and beverages as an artificial sweetener. Initially touted as an anti-ulcer drug, it failed approval due to its carcinogenic properties. With little fanfare and a scourge of conflicts of interest, the drug was later approved as an artificial sweetener. Teaching organic chemistry, Shane taught his students how to identify aspartame’s carcinogenic byproducts using a technique known as TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography). Extracting the ingredients from their favorite diet soda, the simple technique elucidated methanol, formaldehyde and aspartic acid. A new version of aspartame, known as neotame, carries similar risks.
Discovered to be 600 times sweeter than sugar, the drug sucralose (1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside) originated as an insecticide but was later used as an artificial sweetener. The molecule contains a historically deadly “organochlorine” or simply: a Really-Nasty Form of Chlorine (RNFOC). Unlike the harmless ionic bond in table salt, The RNFOC in sucralose is a covalent bond. When used, the RNFOC yields such poisons as insecticides, pesticides, and herbicides. A RNFOC can invade every nook and cranny of the body. Cell walls and DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) - the genetic map of human life - become potential casualties of war. This may result in weakened immune function, irregular heartbeat, agitation, shortness of breath, skin rashes, headaches, liver and kidney damage, birth defects, and cancer. Hiding its origin, sucralose pushers assert that it is “made from sugar.” Sucralose is as close to sugar as glass cleaner is to purified water. France has recently banned such false advertising statements. Burying their head in the sand, the deceit has been ignored by health officials within the USA; sucralose is the most widely used artificial sweetener today.
Most artificial sweeteners are promoted as preventing weight gain. Yet, studies show that they lead to obesity and even pre-diabetes. Scientists writing for Behavioral Neuroscience and The American Heart Association’s journal Circulation, discovered that fake sugar molecules disarm our body’s defense against obesity - calorie counting. The studies showed that “mouth feel” plays a crucial role in the body’s ability to sense the number of calories that are being consumed - and that artificial sweeteners disrupt the natural calorie calculator. This puts users at much higher risk for gaining fat and becoming insulin resistant due to subsequent binge eating.
Learn more with his “Take Action Report.” He is offering it, worth as much as $20, for almost nothing. All you have to do to obtain it instantly is send an email to insulin @ getresponse.com. In return, please perform an act of kindness by forwarding it to friends and family upon receipt. This offer is only valid for 48 hours due to copyright restraints.

Thanks for dropping by!
Awww…
I guess it was just a matter of time. I’ve tried to stay away from that artificial stuff for a while now but it would sure be nice to have something *safe* to be a substitute for sugar, wouldn’t it?
I’m a diet-cola fanatic, so I’ve probably drunken enough aspartame to kill at least a half dozen lab mice. On the other hand, it sounds like I’m pretty safe from getting ulcers.
One of the first paragraphs says something that should always be considered when you hear warnings about cancer risks; the differences between the test animals and humans can be enough to skew the results of the testing.
I don’t think it is time to ban artificial sweeteners in my home based on lab results that use non-humans.
Yes… actually when you think about it, a human sized injection of almost anything in a little test mouse would probably cause problems.
It would be helpful to provide information about the test animals.
Some are bred for the ease they develop cancers and other diseases that labs wish to study. I just wonder if the animals used in these tests were bred for a specific characteristic.
I am not saying they were, but I know that it happens all too often.
I have found that I don’t care for the after taste that a lot of artificial sweeteners leave behind. I am kind of glad in some ways that I don’t care for the taste of them.
I also do not care for the taste of artificial sweeteners. I guess I am a bit of a purist, I use real sugar. And I just try to use it only for cooking/baking.
There was a time when the after taste from some of the artificial sweeteners bothered me… but then I found that I got used to it after using them for a while.
Now I’m back to trying to get rid of them.
Katharina, LOL!
Not having a sweet tooth would definitely be ideal if you are trying to lose weight.
Unfortunately for us that do, it’s either cutting out the sugar together or use the artificial sweeteners. I personally I have been drinking my coffee black for some time now.
Calypso, yikes!
I don’t really do the diet pop stuff because I just feel jipped when you don’t get the full experience of having soda.
That being said, I try to limit my cola intake to about once a week, and I really do savor my time with my special pop moments.
SageMother, you’ve got a point there. Most of the testing is done on mice and they equate how it affects human by math methodologies.
It’s not exactly rocket science and there is a lot of deductive reasoning involved in it.
I do my coffee black, too… it’s other sweet things that bother me and I’ve never had a problem with wanting to sweeten coffee.
I have started drinking my coffee black also since that is where the majority of my sugar intake comes from. I have actually gotten used to the taste of black coffee now.
Katharina, for that sweet tooth of yours…. thank the heavens for 100 calorie snacks.
Because if you are really looking for a sweet fix, you can’t go wrong munching with a whole bag of this stuff and not feel bad about it afterwards.
Leave a Reply